Luke Vibert



Cornwall may have the ‘lowest per capita contribution to the national economy’, but two of its offspring have redefined the electronic music map – Aphex Twin, and prolific electronic recording artist Luke Vibert.

With three albums released already this year, Vibert’s enthusiasm is dampened only by the growing roster of record labels that struggle to keep up with his output.

Planet Mu takes control of Vibert’s latest incarnation, Chicago, Detroit, Redruth - a rollercoaster of radio-friendly Acid House and Breakbeat tunes. The DJ speaks to FM via his steadily collapsing CD tower.

What was your first introduction to electronic music? Well without knowing it, it would have been years ago really. When I was young I just liked pop music and was lucky to grow up in that kind of Krafwerk/Human League era – so most of the things I liked when I was young were electronic pop, but I didn’t really think about it until about 1989/90. Even in the late seventies I used to like stupid things, what were they called? Landscape – Einstein A Go-Go, Trio – Da Da Da, and Prince, but he wasn’t so electronic, funkier I suppose.

When did you become more influenced by the dance music scene? Well, again I liked loads of hip hop stuff, especially The Message – just as pop music without thinking this is hip hop. I knew the blokes were rapping and that wasn’t singing, but it didn’t make any difference to me really. So, yeah, I was lucky in that it was ingrained in my head. I remember when I was about twelve I had a go on a drum machine so I already had a rough idea what kick, snare and hi-hats were. Then in 1988/89 I had one record deck and a rubbish tape deck and I’d try and make hip hop mix tapes and things, which was accidentally when I made up the word ‘trip hop’. I did a load of instrumentals because a few of my mates couldn’t take rap, and I called it trip-hop because I thought it was funny.

So you’re the man who invented trip-hop? I think it’s one of those weird ones where someone else invented it as well a few years later, I think it was like 1995 when most people thought that trip hop was around. But then I was only joking, because it was instrumental hip hop and some of them were quite weird sort of tracks and trip-hop seemed to suit it, but it came back to bite me on the arse later because I got called trip-hop by everyone and I thought “uugh, it’s not fair”. But never mind, it wasn’t as bas as drill’n’bass, that’s the one that really upsets me, when people say, “you invented drill’n’bass, how does that feel?”, and I’m like, hello," what the fuck is drill’n’bass?"

I knew you were into drum’n’bass, but not drill’n’bass? I think it was just because I was the first non-jungle person trying to do jungle in 1994. I just couldn’t do it, I mean I think it was the same story for Squarepusher and Apex Twin – we’d have liked to have been making club bangers but didn’t know how to make it that good. Instead of using quite simple beats we were always a bit up our own arses, so it just came out as rubbish jungle. But loads of people liked it better, so that was pretty cool (laughs).

You’ve released a lot of records under the names Plug, Wagon Christ and Kerrier District, are these used to classify the genre of music you’re making or to keep fans guessing? Definitely not for guessing or anything, I don’t care about that. I came up with about three names originally for different record labels so I could release more stuff, I was making so many tracks and didn’t have to care what the style was. But then I suppose I got into the feeling of having different names, and now, just the other day I started doing something that sounded different to anything I’d done before and I immediately thought, shit, I’ll have to make up another name because it doesn’t fit in my head with whatever existing names I’ve already made. So, yeah I think it is about the style mainly, not that I’d ever know, with Kerrier District it’s kind of Disco, but the rest are harder to pin down really.

You’ve already released three albums this year, do you writing music to keep food on the table or are you just obsessed? Yeah, I’m actually just a horrible person if I don’t make music. I’ve discovered that having kids and with having a few months off every now on then, I just get really annoyed easily and it’s something I feel I have to do to be a normal functioning person. The DJing is more of a money thing, even though in a way it’s more fun than track-making, when it’s good at least. I have to do it every weekend as records aren’t selling so well; there’s definitely more DJing needed to keep my kids in clothes.

So you’re conscious of the effect of file sharing on record sales? I don’t know if that’s what it is – it’s probably something to do with that but maybe I feel somewhere it’s more that kids don’t really care about owning a product so much these days, they’re happy having an MP3 or iPod, whereas my generation was probably one of the last ones to love records and CDs and wanted to own as many as possible. I’m sure it won’t be like that forever, there will always be some kids who are into it – my kids are fetishist about vinyl even though they’re only five and seven. They get really angry with me occasionally and say, “You haven’t played a record for a few days; it’s all computer music, come on, put a record on!” It’s proved to be a pretty reliable format.

I’ve noticed that you tend to switch labels with almost every release, have you always struggled to find a stable home for your output? No, it’s not so much that actually. These days they just can’t handle putting that much out, occasionally I’ll say I’ve got another record and they’re like, shit you’ll have to wait a year or two we don’t have enough money. That’s why I’ve been chucking them out on all kinds of different labels, but I think Planet Mu, Rephlex, and hopefully Warp and Ninja Tune are always permanent, it’s just the latter two that have said you’ll have to wait a couple of years. When you sign contracts they’re supposed to give you more money with each album but they just can’t afford it at the moment.

That’s certainly not a bad collection of labels to be releasing electronic music on? Yeah, I mean Planet Mu’s doing the best out of all of them, although that’s only because there’s one guy who works for them, whereas Warp has about 50 staff members, so you can’t really compare them but most of them are doing pretty badly at the moment and not getting the sales they need.

Your more recent releases, Benefist (The Ace of Clubs) and the collaboration with Jean-Jaques Perry (Moog Acid), have swung back in the direction of Acid House. Is there any particular reason? I’ve always been into Acid House actually but I don’t think I had the bottle, I don’t know if that’s the right word, but it did take me ages to release the more simple stuff. My first releases on Riding High wanted to be clever or intellectual, even though the music I enjoyed by other people was a lot more simple, clubby, banging kind of stuff. But somehow I didn’t feel I could make that, maybe I thought it was too black and I was too white, or some awful thing like that, so it’s just taken me years really to think, fuck it, I’ll just do whatever I want whether it’s hip hop, acid house or drum’n’bass. In a way my stuff’s become a lot more clubby, maybe because I DJ so much in clubs that I want to play it out and over the years I’ve thought I can’t because there’s not enough kick or snare. So I’ve become a bit more old school in that way.

The latest Luke Vibert album is titled Chicago, Detroit, Redruth, which is an interesting title? It was just a stupid track name, and I always limit myself to calling an album one of the track titles on it. I think it was some sort of route because I was born in Redruth in Cornwall and lived there for years, and then the track has elements of Chicago acid and Detroit techno (laughs), but I like the title, it kind of sounds silly and funny.

It’s one of my favourite albums of yours because it’s very melodic and unpretentious, and also much more accessible than some of your previous work. Absolutely yeah, in a way I’d have to give Mike Paradinas (Mu-Ziq and Planet Mu label boss) quite a lot of credit even though they’re all my tracks. He’s a good mate of mine and hears everything I do. I gave him a great load to choose from and he spent a few months sequencing it and running it by me, there’s probably not anyone else I’d trust to sequence an album for me but I trust him more than myself because we like the same things and he’s as close to the tracks as I am. Sometimes I like a track better than I should for one reason or another; not because it’s good but maybe I was in a wicked mood when I did it, but if I can trust outside people then I tend to a lot more than myself.

How many tracks did you give him to choose from and is this how you would typically present an album to a label? Mike’s got hundreds of my tracks, but generally I would never do that at all – there’s only him, Grant Wilson-Claridge and Richard D. James who do Rephlex, and it’s only because they’re my mates so I give them the tracks anyway. I do so many more than I can release so it’s nice to give them away for some reason. With Warp and Ninja I’d be really scared of doing that because I don’t know who is listening to it and who is deciding, I had some situations with Mo Wax and even Ninja in the past where they said weird things like, “yeah, we really like this track but it’s not quite ‘Ninja’ enough,” and I’d get really confused because god knows what that is? They’re not thinking about what they like so much as will this be successful or who is going to buy this, but I’m never thinking that when I make the tracks - I mean you can’t help it sometimes afterwards but when you’re making it you’re just trying to do the best you can.

The grooves and breaks are very simplistic on your records, so what would you say the focal point of your music is? I don’t know really, I suppose I like to try and have my cake and eat it. So maybe good rhythms, good breaks, melodies, chords and nice arrangements. I always try to make every track a mini-world if you like, unless it’s old acidy shit, in which case I don’t even have my computer on usually, I just get old synths out and jam then edit it down later to make it sound more compact. But yeah, I do have different ways of working depending on what mood I’m in. I can’t handle full-on arrangements on computers sometimes, so it’s nice to just close the monitor, get out some synths and play live stuff.

Do you usually have a pre-conceived idea of what you want a record to sound like? I think literally only once have I thought that, and that was my very first Wagon Christ album on Rising High, called Phat Lab Nightmare. It’s an ambient one, and they told me they could only release ambient records at that time because they were the only ones selling album-wise. I’d done a vaguely techno 12” but they didn’t want that stuff on a full album as it was still early days for dance music and people weren’t buying techno on albums. But, yeah, I thought “right, ambient album”, and tried to get in the right mood, but I think with every other record I’ve just done loads and loads of tracks and tried to forget about them for a week or two, then go back and try to work out which sit happily together. Sometimes the best ones stand out a bit too much for me, so I kick them off the record, which has bitten me on the arse a few times, because I think about saving it for something else but it never gets released.

Seeing as you obviously record at quite a prolific rate how quickly might you finish off a track? In a day? Oh easy, yeah, it can be a couple of hours if I’m in the right mood, especially the acidy ones with just a drum machine and a Roland 303, and then I might add some live bits on to it later. It’s also really different now; I used an Atari until 2000, so if I started a track I’d have to finish it before doing another one. Now of course you can just save an infinite amount of things, it’s quite wicked really. Depending on what mood I’m in I can just get loads of beats going and save them or just do tiny little bits on each track if I’m not quite in the mood to do full-on tracks. You don’t feel like you’re doing much but then there comes a day when you finish about twenty tracks in one day because all they need is a little bit of arranging, so the tracks come together more casually.

I understand you record everything on a laptop? Yeah, in a way I still prefer hardware, but being a sample-head it’s so much easier with a computer instead of having hardware samplers. I’m a sucker for being kind of lazy, so I definitely wouldn’t like to use computers at all, but you just have to really.

Do you use a custom-built laptop? God no, I just got myself a slightly too cheap one actually, I was thinking, shit I should have gone for the model up, but no, I’m quite a tight bastard (laughs). I haven’t got anything that good really and loads of my old synths are broken which is really annoying. I should get them fixed but I never know if they’re going to cost tons of money to get fixed so I always think maybe one day I’ll make a friend who can fix analogue synths. I’ve got three which have just gone to white noise now.


"Just the other day I started doing something that sounded different to anything I’d done before and I immediately thought, shit, I’ll have to make up another name because it doesn’t fit in my head with whatever existing names I’ve already made"

What software are you running on your laptop? Reason at the amount, and I do have the MOTU Digital Performer because I had to record in some old 4-track stuff recently. I found this old pile of 4-track tapes. I can complete a track 100% using Reason but I don’t use many of their sounds, which is where my synths come in handy – I like having a hard drive full of synth sounds and drum hits. I have done a few tracks where it’s all Reason, but it’s taken me so much longer to make it sound passable to my ears.

Is it a case of if you’re using their sounds then your record is going to sound like 1000 other peoples’? No I never worry about that so much really, I’m always using the same sounds again and again and I know other people have used them, little stabs or snares off famous beats. It’s the actual textures; if I’ve used more digital stuff then I have to put loads of crackles or something on it just to try and make it sound a bit less clean and FM radio-sounding (laughs).

Are you able to plug outboard gear into the laptop? No, I’m just being lazy really and sampling. Sometimes I’ll have an actual tune in my head and I’ll just play it alongside the track then record it in and maybe cut it up and tweak it a bit if it’s loose. Usually, I’ve got so many sounds anyway, and what with filter effects and things I can usually butcher something into a track, so I’ve got quite a few long notes of synth sounds, moogy or acidy or farty. I had a few sessions with the Roland 101 years ago on a DAT and then recorded the whole DAT in, so occasionally I just sort of flick through it quickly and find something that seems to fit.

So what outboard gear do you currently use? Well all I’ve used recently really is old Roland stuff - something zero something. I love the Roland 101 and 303 for synths and the SH100 is really nice for samples. I often use a Pearl Syncussion box to make mad bass lines, but again I’ve got so many samples of it already, kicks and long bass notes, that I tend to be able to use them instead of getting the synths out again. I’ve got a few older things like Gens - Italian synths – those are two of the broken ones. I’ve lent out quite a few as well recently because I felt guilty about not using them. There’s probably a couple of things I’m forgetting about but, no compressors or effects really, I’ve never been so into that scene otherwise I’d fuck around all day. That’s why I use Reason, because I did have Cubase and used loads of plug-ins for a little bit, but I just got too carried away fucking around with effects, so I thought right I’m not going to use plug-ins anymore.

When you see other artists in magazines with huge racks, desks and gear, do you think they’re being a bit over-indulgent? Yeah, I mean I feel really lucky in a way because I’ve got a couple of mates who have got loads of gear, like Aphex – and it is really nice to fuck around with gear, but for me it doesn’t really work because that’s all I’d do. If there are a million options then I will try and go through them all and see which one is the best, which is why I like Reason because you have to think, oh well, that’s not perfect but it’ll do, and you actually get things done. But yeah, it’s also lush to nip down the road and play with my mates’ proper studios (laughs).
You’re not still based in Cornwall? No, not for years, I couldn’t make a living down there. Half the time I’m in London for gigs and stuff and then my kids and missus are in Marseille in France, because she’s French. Since the kids started school a couple of years ago we’ve been over there. It’s quite good really, I can sort of split my life in half, I’m dad and then musician, and don’t mix the two up much. I don’t try making tracks when I’m over in Marseille, I just wait until I come back here which is quite good because then I’m burning to do it again.

Have you never been outgoing enough to want to join a band, and do you thing technology affords you the solitary environment that’s best for you? Yeah, absolutely. In a way, maybe I’m a bit lazy and I should join a band, but then again I had to start with quite weird bits of hardware, which does help a lot. If you start with Pro Tools and a laptop when you’re 12-years-old it’s a pretty powerful tool that one can tend to take for granted. It’s a weird thought for me to imagine that technology is leading things; if you’re going through a million plug-ins and you find a sound which sounds completely mental then in a way that’s cheating, it’s just someone else’s work. But that’s not really what stops me from doing it, else I wouldn’t sample never mind stealing bits off other people (laughs).

Would you say then that your self-education has given you a certain mastery over technology? I think what I have to do is feel like I have a mastery of whatever I’m using, and that’s why I stick with Reason, because I like to feel that I’m using, maybe not 100%, but at least most of its features, whereas I felt really bad with Cubase and Logic because I was only using literally 5-10% of what I could use. I like that feeling of getting the most our of something but I could never control a more powerful programme, like SuperCollider – music’s got to be a bit more down to earth for me.

Do you listen to much electronic music in your spare time? I suppose I don’t really, other than I’m lucky to have loads of mates on Planet Mu and people who send me their stuff, so I do listen to a fair amount. Because I hear a lot in clubs when I’m at home I tend to go completely the other way and listen to stupid theme tunes or old 50s organ music, anywhere away from electronic stuff. When I’m in Marseille I want to make music more but I can’t so then I tend to play a lot more of my mates’ stuff or hip hop and grime, but yeah, I’m pretty bad really, I don’t care much about keeping up with things. In a way I think it’s sort of detrimental to me because in the past listening to new music made me forget what I do well. I’d try and have a go at Speed Garage or whatever, but in that week when that I’ve tried to do a crap Speed Garage track I could have done three good tracks. Most artistic people don’t want to be affected by outside influences.

I want to talk about your mates. You’ve known Richard D. James since the birth of modern dance music, how do you think electronic music has evolved since then and how influential has he been? Really massively influential I think, even stupid things like you get loads of drum machine sounds these days with his sounds on them. Obviously production has changed quite a lot, in a way I prefer that old stuff, even his. I’d happily tell him that I prefer his nineties tracks to stuff now; maybe there’s some sort of energy that you can’t really quantify that comes across in those tracks and when you get older you just can’t keep that energy up any more. But, yeah, definitely a massive influence on me, not so much through tracks but just from doing stuff in his bedroom. I think 1988/89 was the first time I’d heard Richard’s stuff before I met him in 1990, but his tapes were passed around because he only lived a few miles down the road and people would say, “this is that guy from Lanner” – really alien, evil music that came out of nowhere. When we found out he was doing it just up the road in his bedroom we thought, fuck the bands, let’s go in the bedroom and just make simple, wicked electronic stuff – but it didn’t really work for a few years. But I think he was really impressive on that level, he had it sussed for years. Even though we’re roughly the same age, he’s a hell of a lot more experienced. It was nice; he’d help us out when we did meet him, even driving me around, because I never learned to drive, checking out people with samplers.

Privately, you’ve recorded a lot of music with Richard and also Mike Paradinas (Mu-Ziq) and Tom Jenkinson (Squarepusher); will any of this see the light of day? Not really because they’re never more than jams. I’ll simply go and see them and they’ll say, “Ooh look, I’ve got a lush new synth”, and we’ll have a jam and maybe record that, but they’d usually be quite simple, bizarre acidy tracks or something. We’ve never sort of tried to make a normal track, a proper track – they’re always like 45 minutes long. Tom would always play bass for a couple of hours - I’ve got DATs full of him playing bass so I could sample it and use it – he’d always say yeah, yeah, just take whatever you want. Mike Paradinas and I only ever did one track together, I don’t know why – he finds it harder to make music because he’s so busy running that bloody label.

You used to tour a lot with these guys in the past, is this something you’re doing as often now? I’d really like to, but they’re no so into it anymore. I don’t know if it’s a money thing or they’re a bit shyer than me. I like playing to people, always have, but they’ve always had a weird, double-edged thing. I think Richard does two or three gigs a year and Tom does a few more, but they’re not really up for the big tours anymore, which is shame because we’d do a month in America and a month in Australia, I fucking loved it. It does sort of take it out of you, all the drugs.

For some who see them as rather an enigma, perhaps Tom more than Richard even, how would you evaluate their characteristics? I mean they’re both definitely artist-y, which sorts of means they’re cunts and wankers in a way, because I totally feel like that myself, although when you have kids they really kick you up the arse and you just have to forget about yourself for quite a while and concentrate on them. But yeah, they’re really good mates, and I get on with them well and know what to say and how to be, but I see so many times that people come up to them and get a bad impression and think they’re being horrible or whatever. I know it’s just sort of shyness and the fact that maybe they don’t quite know where to put themselves when people are saying, “oh, you’re a genius!!” They’re really sort of sweet, down-to-earth blokes, which always surprises people when they meet them and they’re in the right kind of mood, or maybe when people say the right kind of things. But yeah, I’ve seen them quite a few times at gigs, maybe when they’ve not done such a good performance and got really pissed off, so they can be a bit arty farty. As an artist, you have to keep some little kernel of being a complete self-centred cunt about you, otherwise you can’t really create. There’s some part of you that has to think you’re the best in the world and you deserve to be treated like a god (laughs).

Surely the music’s the only thing that counts at the end of the day? Yeah, too right, especially for the listener. I think they have a harder time than me because they haven’t got so many aliases. It might sound stupid, but I think they think a lot more about what ‘Aphex Twin’ or ‘Squarepusher’ should do instead of what Richard D. James or Tom Jenkinson thinks they should do. I’ve heard them both saying it, so I’d say, “well what do you mean, that’s just you, what do YOU want to do?” I sure there’s loads of artists who feel like that, but I’ve never really felt like that, maybe because I’ve got loads of names – god knows. But that’s a really weird thing for me to get my head round, thinking what should I do next? I just do loads of tracks all the time and the ones I like I release, so it’s really simple for me.

If you did something a lot more experimental would you be less likely to attach it to a release under the name Luke Vibert? No, in a way that would probably be the stuff I’d be most happy to release as Luke Vibert, and maybe the more simple, slightly sillier stuff I’ll call Amen Andrews or some other silly name to imply that maybe it’s not very well thought about (laughs).

You must have been on drugs when you thought that name up. Are we going to get any more? Maybe a Terry Wogan pseudonym? (Laughs) No, I don’t think I was on drugs amazingly – I genuinely thought it was a good name at the time. The pun was only because of the Amen break. It was really made for when I am at the end of a night and want to play some stupid, fast, rinsing tracks.

Are you DJing much at the moment? Yep, loads – just about every weekend including a few festivals. There’s a wicked gig on the 7th December in Manchester @ Warehouse Project with Aphex Twin – the first gig he’s done this year. The others are mainly just small club things where I’m the headline name, usually abroad in Sweden or Amsterdam, last weekend was Belgium.

It’s been a busy year for you, but do you have any more releases in the pipeline? I’ve had quite a while off actually, a couple of months with the kids for the summer holidays. I’m just getting my head down again. I don’t know really, I never work on one album at time, in fact I’ll do a disco track and then the next track’s got to be something different because I’ve got a short attention span. 90% of my tracks are slow, hip hop tracks that rarely get released because no fucker wants them, the more up-tempo ones are what the labels want to release.

Luke Vibert interview, Barcode 2008 ©
No part of this interview may be reproduced under any circumstances without the written or verbal permission of the editor.